<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimal web page layout width</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: verolf</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>verolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>@bruno
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bruno<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>@verolf
I guess things haven&#039;t changed that much.
Although very big monitors (22&quot; and up) are becoming increasingly popular, many people are still trapped behind 1024x768 resolutions. This very week I was working on a project which had, believe it or not, support for 800x600 resolutions as a requirement. And the expansion of netbooks also brings the average resolution down a bit.

So my advice would be: if you&#039;re redesigning an existing website, check the access statistics to get to know your audience and their setup; if it&#039;s a new site, it would be much safer to keep working on 960, at least for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@verolf<br />
I guess things haven&#8217;t changed that much.<br />
Although very big monitors (22&#8243; and up) are becoming increasingly popular, many people are still trapped behind 1024&#215;768 resolutions. This very week I was working on a project which had, believe it or not, support for 800&#215;600 resolutions as a requirement. And the expansion of netbooks also brings the average resolution down a bit.</p>
<p>So my advice would be: if you&#8217;re redesigning an existing website, check the access statistics to get to know your audience and their setup; if it&#8217;s a new site, it would be much safer to keep working on 960, at least for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verolf</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>verolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>Hit submit to fast!

that = what

sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hit submit to fast!</p>
<p>that = what</p>
<p>sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verolf</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>verolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>+1 Lexi
Sometimes it can be so difficult to find an answer for a simple question. That page width is preferred to use among designers now a year after this post? Is it 955 px?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 Lexi<br />
Sometimes it can be so difficult to find an answer for a simple question. That page width is preferred to use among designers now a year after this post? Is it 955 px?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Oh, glad I could help, Lexi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, glad I could help, Lexi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexi</title>
		<link>http://www.brunobergher.com/blog/2008/05/05/optimal-web-page-layout-width/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brunobergher.com/?p=100#comment-340</guid>
		<description>This is the very information I&#039;ve been seeking.  Thanks for the excellent post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the very information I&#8217;ve been seeking.  Thanks for the excellent post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
